The Dragoness: Command of the Flame

It's not exactly HoMaM clone, as is quite often mentioned. There are of course some strong similarities, especially tb tactical battles, consisting of moving units on hex field. Essential difference, though, is absence of big open maps in Dragoness. Main focus here are shorter, handcrafted missions (cleverly designed, often with cool gimmick or two). This also determines army management, where instead of hoarding units, you need to consider limited resources and army capacity against strategic needs. As a result, gameplay is pretty tight, with almost no filler battles, no expendable units, but a lot of small important decisions to contemplate. Who to recruit, who to upgrade, what abilities to take, who to fight... It can get quite intensive. In a good way.
Dragoness is not overreaching and it certainly manages to make advantage from its lower budget and scale. Thanks to this it definitely becomes no clone, but its own thing, which I find highly respectable.
P. S. If you want to discover other less knows gems, you're welcome to visit my curator page: Nods for Underdogs.

The Dragoness: Command of the Flame is a turn-based “army tactics” game wrapped in a classic adventure-map loop. You travel across a world map, pick fights and events, gather resources, and build up a stack of units that you deploy in battles. The vibe is closer to old-school Heroes-like strategy than to a tight, squad-based tactics game.
A big part of the experience happens between fights. The overworld is where you choose your route, decide which encounters are worth the risk, and try to arrive at the hard battles with enough strength and momentum. It creates a steady feeling of journey and planning, even when the individual battles are fairly straightforward.
The game also leans into a roguelite structure: runs are meant to be repeated, and your path choices shape how powerful you become over time. Instead of one long campaign with perfectly controlled growth, you’re often working with what you’ve got, adapting your army based on what you can recruit and what your run offers you. That “make the best of this run” mindset is the main hook.
Combat is turn-based and focuses on placement, matchups, and keeping your army alive. You’re generally thinking in terms of “what unit counters what” and “how do I trade efficiently,” rather than mastering complex combos or deep multi-turn tactics. When it clicks, it’s satisfying in a clean, board-game way—set up advantages early and let the fight tilt in your favor.
The base-building and metaprogression layer is present, but it’s not an enormous management sim. It works more like a hub that turns your run rewards into upgrades and new options, so the next attempt starts with more flexibility. If you like light, tangible progression without heavy spreadsheets, it’s a comfortable middle ground.
Where the game can lose people is variety and intensity. Some players will find that battles start to feel similar after a while, and the strategic layer may come across as “good enough” rather than especially deep. If you need constant mechanical novelty, you might feel the repetition more sharply than the game intends.
Overall, The Dragoness: Command of the Flame is best for someone who wants the adventure-map fantasy of recruiting and growing an army, with a run-based structure that encourages repeating and improving. It’s less ideal if you’re looking for top-tier tactical complexity or highly varied encounter design. Treated as a relaxed, Heroes-flavored strategy roguelite, it can be an enjoyable niche pick.

I really enjoyed the gameplay and figuring out what units I wanted to play each run. I do not have a lot of time into the HOMM series so I cannot say much about the comparisons, but I really liked the graphics and the town building aspect. Only real gripe I have is late game it seems like some of the town unlocks are not needed or really helpful. I was really hoping the town would be a bigger factor into making my Units more OP :) I casually played on easy mode just to experience the gameplay and after finishing the game I wished there was more to play and build on. Overall I was very satisfied with my purchase.

The differences towards HoMaM and King's Bounty:
- It's a roguelite game. After each map you may tweak little things at your city, but you start each map with almost nothing and character level 1.
- Ranged attackers are mostly useless. Enemies must pass half the battleground, so that these units do full damage. Else the damage is meaningless.
- Considering tha game is made by a small indie studio, it is pretty good. But you have to deal with above mechanics, if you like KB and HoMaM.

The Dragoness: Command of the Flame is an ambitious indie strategy title that aims to revive the spirit of classic fantasy strategy games while layering in modern roguelite progression and city management systems. Developed by Crazy Goat Games and published by PQube, the game clearly wears its inspirations on its sleeve, drawing heavily from the design philosophy of older titles where careful planning, army composition, and long-term resource management were just as important as battlefield tactics. The result is a multifaceted experience that is rich in ideas, occasionally rough in execution, but undeniably distinctive in its scope and intent.
The game’s narrative framework establishes a dark fantasy setting shaped by war, ruin, and draconic dominance. You take on the role of a Commander serving under the enigmatic Dragoness, tasked with reclaiming and rebuilding the shattered capital of Níwenborh while pushing back hostile dragon factions across the Drairthir Peninsula. Rather than focusing on deeply personal character arcs, the story functions primarily as a strategic backdrop, providing motivation and context for your actions. Dialogue and story beats are delivered through illustrated scenes and voice acting, giving the campaign a sense of scale and continuity even if the writing itself leans toward familiar fantasy tropes rather than nuanced storytelling.
Exploration takes place on a turn-based overworld map, where every movement consumes resources and time. This structure forces players to weigh risk versus reward constantly, deciding whether to pursue distant objectives, engage roaming enemies, or return to safety before resources run dry. The pacing here evokes classic strategy titles, where progress feels deliberate and methodical rather than immediate. While this approach enhances the sense of planning and consequence, it can also feel slow, particularly during longer missions where backtracking or repeated encounters stretch playtime without introducing new dynamics.
Combat unfolds on grid-based battlefields and forms the tactical core of the experience. Players command armies composed primarily of beast units, each with specific roles, strengths, and abilities that reward thoughtful positioning and synergy. In theory, battles offer meaningful strategic depth, encouraging experimentation with army composition and ability usage. In practice, however, combat can sometimes feel plodding. Animations are functional but lack impact, and encounters can drag on longer than necessary, reducing tension and making repetition more noticeable over extended play sessions. Still, when systems align and unit abilities complement one another, the tactical layer delivers satisfying moments of calculated victory.
One of the game’s most distinctive features is its city-building and progression layer. Reconstructing Níwenborh serves as the long-term backbone of the campaign, with buildings unlocking new units, bonuses, and strategic options. This persistent development creates a strong sense of advancement that carries across individual runs, reinforcing the roguelite structure. Even when a campaign ends unsuccessfully, progress made in the city helps future attempts feel stronger and more informed. While not as deep as a dedicated city builder, this system adds meaningful context to exploration and combat, making victories and failures alike feel consequential.
Visually, The Dragoness: Command of the Flame adopts a stylized, somewhat restrained presentation. Environments and units convey the fantasy setting clearly, but the overall aesthetic lacks the polish and dynamism of higher-budget strategy titles. Interface design is dense and occasionally unintuitive, presenting a learning curve that can be discouraging for newcomers. Tooltips and explanations are present but not always sufficient, leading to moments where mechanics feel opaque rather than challenging. For players willing to invest time into understanding the systems, this complexity eventually becomes manageable, but it remains one of the game’s most frequently cited hurdles.
Replayability is built into the game’s structure through procedural elements, branching objectives, and persistent progression. Each campaign offers slightly different challenges and opportunities, encouraging players to adapt strategies rather than rely on a single optimal approach. However, the balance between handcrafted content and procedural variation is uneven, sometimes resulting in runs that feel either overly familiar or awkwardly paced. This inconsistency can make replay sessions feel unpredictable in both positive and negative ways.
Ultimately, The Dragoness: Command of the Flame is a game defined by its ambition. It attempts to merge turn-based exploration, tactical combat, city management, and roguelite progression into a single cohesive experience, and while it doesn’t always succeed seamlessly, the effort is evident throughout. For fans of classic fantasy strategy games who are willing to accept slower pacing, dated presentation, and occasional mechanical friction, it offers a deep and rewarding strategic loop. It may not reach the heights of its inspirations, but it stands as a passionate and content-rich entry that values long-term planning and strategic commitment over instant gratification.
Rating: 6/10

a bit rough on ui/ux
overall very much worth it with the 80% off right now

The Dragoness: Command of the Flame is a game that resembles the various HoMM (Heroes of Might and Magic) titles, but with significant differences.
Similarities to HoMM
The game is set in a fantasy world and is played in turns (both the exploration and combat phases).
You have a city which provides abilities and where you can recruit troops.
You command a hero who can level up and gain abilities as they progress, and who can lead up to six different combat units in battle.
The hero moves around the map according to their movement capacity, using one action point (AP) per move, while attacking or collecting nearby objects does not require AP.
Across the game maps, you can collect resources, food, artefacts, bonuses, upgrades, and new troops. All of these are almost always guarded by enemy forces.
Differences from HoMM
You only have one city (which does not appear on the map); you cannot conquer other cities, nor can you lose your own.
You have just one hero, and their abilities change at the start of every mission (roguelike-style). Essentially, a new level 1 hero with random abilities is generated at the beginning of each mission.
Each of the six-unit slots for the hero’s army holds just a single unit, not dozens or hundreds. Troops always start at base level (0) and can be upgraded to level 1 if you find a duplicate. Similarly, two level 1 units can be merged to create a level 2 unit (the maximum).
The number of magic spells and abilities is greatly reduced and are only acquired as your hero levels up.
The base troops are always available in city (if you construct the relevant buildings and purchase upgrades). Other types of creatures can be recruited by spending specific runes found in the game (these are limited, so you typically begin with the base troops).
Opinion
Personally, I do not consider this game on par with the classic HoMM titles (specifically the first three), but it is not so poorly made as to deserve a negative rating… obviously, this is just my own view. When I do not enjoy a game, I do not finish it; in this case, I completed it in about 45 hours, which means that, for me, it is at least a passable game. Specifically, I would give it a 7 out of 10. So, it left me with a generally pleasant experience, even if its structural limitations prevented it from receiving a higher score.
Recommendation
If, like me, you have played all the original HoMM games (from 1995 to 2015), you might consider giving this game a chance. However, if you are not accustomed to turn-based fantasy games, I would suggest starting with any famous games by Larian Studio (e.g. Divinity: Original Sin (1 and 2) or their latest game Baldur's Gate III) or other classic games like Blackguard (1 and 2) by Daedalic Entertainment or any other game tagged as fantasy, turn-based, RPG that holds at least an 80% positive rating.