The campaign begins with the fact that in 2021 terrorists began to massively undermine the power plants of the planet, plunging humanity into chaos. Escaped to the underground bunkers of the "endozone" for 150 years, he hid from a general catastrophe and finally decided to return to the surface. Lead a group of survivors in a harsh radioactive environment. The ever-changing climate, dirty and toxic rains and the enemy in the form of terrorist groups will force you to learn how to survive from scratch and prove that you are a real leader. You must build a shelter on a hostile surface. There are 30 different building types available for the convenience of your settlers. However, expansion will require a variety of resources and a well-planned economy. Develop efficient infrastructure, stock up on provisions, make your home comfortable for long stays.
Steam User 29
This is a deep and enjoyable city builder. I played it after completing Surviving the Aftermath which it is often compared to. That game is more simple and easier however it feels more real in terms of managing a colony of people trying to survive in the wasteland. I never really got attached to the people in Endzone and the game feels more like a puzzle exercise where everything needs to be balanced carefully.
Endzone is challenging (especially when beginning to play) as there are many ways for the colony to quickly perish - over population, starvation/thirst, raiders. disease, sandstorms, radiation etc. After understanding how to mange the colony however the game becomes pretty routine, just carefully expanding, gaining new tech and managing the identical dangers that occur periodically.
A better endgame such as exiting the planet for better environments or going underground to escape the surface dangers would have improved the game considerably. Having said that, I would recommend the game wholeheartedly. It will give you 50 hours of enjoyment at least before it becomes too repetitive. I also experienced no performance issues with larger colonies which was appreciated.
Steam User 26
this game is both good and bad. from mid to late game it flat lines almost completely with nothing left to do and effectively has a soft ending. The resource management is god awful late game, you will slowly but surely reach a plateau of all production that simply will never keep up to the population nad as soon as this takes place everyone either leaves dies or just stops working just because you are low on either food water or materials. i give this game a very neutral rating neither good or bad just stuck somewhere in between and the dlc really don't add anything worth paying for. I wont recommend this game at full price and only at a discount.
Steam User 27
Good city builder with a grunge/post-apocalyptic theme... a Fallout city builder if you like. Good game, rock-solid & sensible... as in no ridiculously silly dynamics, plus relevant tiering, your old stuff & resources are are still relevant end game.
I recommend the add-ons, as they add a lot of replayibility & depth to the game, but the game is also fine without them.
Steam User 20
This game doesn't deserve mixed reviews its a fine survival city building game. I thoroughly enjoy games like this and you can play on a variety of difficulties including chillax ezmode (I assume) although I prefer harder difficulties because I like to see what happens and how fast. So far all the mixed reviews sound like skill issues and one guy hating on them for doing a kick starter for the second game which isn't uncommon or unethical for game devs to do.
It's a great game I got it on massive discount and I plan on getting Endzone 2 after I plug a couple hundred hours into this. I played the Endzone 2 demo as well and it seems legit.
Great series well done.
Steam User 24
After playing for almost 15hrs, this game isn't too bad as they say.
The mechanics are similar to Frostpunk survival-based city building game yet it has different setting, different approach, different features and has a decent game difficullty.
This game is so chill.
Steam User 19
I love fallout games.
I love civilization VI.
I love city building simulators.
And apparently there's middle ground called Endzone: a fallout wibes giving civilization building post apocalypse hyping addiction inducing entertainment producing love child of a game.
I literally can't come up with a single negative thing about this game.
Tho my gaming laptop might have a heated opinion...
Steam User 22
✔️ The Good
• Engaging Gameplay: Endzone 2 offers a captivating and immersive gaming experience, keeping players hooked from start to finish.
• Stunning Graphics: The game boasts impressive visuals, with detailed landscapes and environments that enhance the overall gaming atmosphere.
• Robust Crafting System: The extensive crafting options add depth to the gameplay, allowing players to customize and strategize their survival approach.
• Compelling Storyline: A well-crafted narrative keeps players invested in the post-apocalyptic world, unraveling mysteries and driving the gameplay forward.
• Varied Challenges: Endzone 2 presents a diverse range of challenges, ensuring that players are constantly adapting their strategies for survival.
❌ The Bad
• Steep Learning Curve: The initial learning curve might be challenging for newcomers, requiring some time to fully grasp the game mechanics.
• Limited Exploration: While the game world is richly detailed, some players may find the exploration aspect somewhat constrained.
• Occasional Bugs: Endzone 2 is not without its glitches, with occasional bugs that can temporarily disrupt the gaming experience.
⚠️The Ugly
• Lackluster AI: The artificial intelligence, particularly of non-player characters, can be erratic and detracts from the overall realism.
• Repetitive Soundtrack: The game's soundtrack, while initially atmospheric, becomes repetitive over time, diminishing its impact.
• Inconsistent Performance: Some players may experience performance issues, especially on lower-end hardware, affecting the overall enjoyment.
Overall Score:
7.1/10